NHS Digital Data Release Register - reformatted

NHS Great Yarmouth And Waveney Ccg

Project 1 — NIC-100546-M1J6C

Opt outs honoured: N, Y

Sensitive: Sensitive

When: 2017/12 — 2018/02.

Repeats: Ongoing

Legal basis: Health and Social Care Act 2012, Section 251 approval is in place for the flow of identifiable data

Categories: Anonymised - ICO code compliant, Identifiable

Datasets:

  • SUS data (Accident & Emergency, Admitted Patient Care & Outpatient)
  • Improving Access to Psychological Therapies Data Set
  • Maternity Services Dataset
  • Mental Health Services Data Set
  • Local Provider Data - Acute
  • Local Provider Data - Ambulance
  • Local Provider Data - Community
  • Local Provider Data - Demand for Service
  • Local Provider Data - Diagnostic Services
  • Local Provider Data - Mental Health
  • Local Provider Data - Emergency Care
  • Local Provider Data - Experience Quality and Outcomes
  • Local Provider Data - Other not elsewhere classified

Benefits:

Expected measurable benefits to health and/or social care including target date: Risk Stratification Risk stratification promotes improved case management in primary care and will lead to the following benefits being realised: Improved planning by better understanding patient flows through the healthcare system, thus allowing commissioners to design appropriate pathways to improve patient flow and allowing commissioners to identify priorities and identify plans to address these. Improved quality of services through reduced emergency readmissions, especially avoidable emergency admissions. This is achieved through mapping of frequent users of emergency services and early intervention of appropriate care. Improved access to services by identifying which services may be in demand but have poor access, and from this identify areas where improvement is required. Potentially reduced premature mortality by more targeted intervention in primary care, which supports the commissioner to meets its requirement to reduce premature mortality in line with the CCG Outcome Framework. Better understanding of the health of and the variations in health outcomes within the population to help understand local population characteristics. All of the above lead to improved patient experience through more effective commissioning of services. Commissioning (Pseudonymised) – SUS and Local Flows Supporting Quality Innovation Productivity and Prevention (QIPP) to review demand management, integrated care and pathways. Analysis to support full business cases. Develop business models. Monitor In year projects. Supporting Joint Strategic Needs Assessment (JSNA) for specific disease types. Health economic modelling using: Analysis on provider performance agains wait targets. Learning from and predicting likely patient pathways for certain conditions, in order to influence early interventions and other treatments for patients. Analysis of outcome measures for differential treatments, accounting for the full patient pathway. Analysis to understand emergency care and linking A&E and Emergency Urgent Care Flows. Commissioning cycle support for grouping and re-costing previous activity. Enables monitoring of: CCG outcome indicators. Non-financial validation of activity. Successful delivery of integrated care within the CCG. Checking frequent or multiple attendances to improve early intervention and avoid admissions. Case management. Care service planning. Commissioning and performance management. List size verification by GP practices. Understanding the care of patients in nursing homes. Feedback to NHS service providers on data quality at an aggregate and individual record level – only on data initially provided by the service providers. Commissioning (Pseudonymised) – Mental Health, Maternity, IAPT, CYPHS and DIDS Supporting Quality Innovation Productivity and Prevention (QIPP) to review demand management, Integrated care and pathways. Analysis to support full business cases. Develop business models. Monitor In year projects. Supporting Joint Strategic Needs Assessment (JSNA) for specific disease types. Health economic modelling using: Analysis on provider performance against targets. Learning from and predicting likely patient pathways for certain conditions, in order to influence early interventions and other treatments for patients. Analysis of outcome measures for differential treatments, accounting for the full patient pathway. Commissioning cycle support for grouping and re-costing previous activity. Enables monitoring of: CCG outcome indicators. Non-financial validation of activity. Successful delivery of integrated care within the CCG. Checking frequent or multiple attendances to improve early intervention and avoid admissions. Case management. Care service planning. Commissioning and performance management. List size verification by GP practices. Understanding the care of patients in nursing homes. Feedback to NHS service providers on data quality at an aggregate and individual record level – only on data initially provided by the service providers.

Outputs:

Specific outputs expected, including target date: Risk Stratification As part of the risk stratification processing activity detailed above, GPs have access to the risk stratification tool which highlights patients for whom the GP is responsible and have been classed as at risk. The only identifier available to GPs is the NHS numbers of their own patients. Any further identification of the patients will be completed by the GP on their own systems. Output from the risk stratification tool will provide aggregate reporting of number and percentage of population found to be at risk. Record level output will be available for commissioners (of the CCG), pseudonymised at patient level. GP Practices will be able to view the risk scores for individual patients with the ability to display the underlying SUS data for the individual patients when it is required for direct care purposes by someone who has a legitimate relationship with the patient. The CCG will be able to target specific patient groups and enable clinicians with the duty of care for the patient to offer appropriate interventions. The CCG will also be able to: Stratify populations based on: disease profiles; conditions currently being treated; current service use; pharmacy use and risk of future overall cost Plan work for commissioning services and contracts Set up capitated budgets Identify health determinants of risk of admission to hospital, or other adverse care outcomes. Commissioning (Pseudonymised) – SUS and Local Flows Commissioner reporting: Summary by provider view - plan & actuals year to date (YTD). Summary by Patient Outcome Data (POD) view - plan & actuals YTD. Summary by provider view - activity & finance variance by POD. Planned care by provider view - activity & finance plan & actuals YTD. Planned care by POD view - activity plan & actuals YTD. Provider reporting. Statutory returns. Statutory returns - monthly activity return. Statutory returns - quarterly activity return. Delayed discharges. Quality & performance referral to treatment reporting. Readmissions analysis. Production of aggregate reports for CCG Business Intelligence. Production of project / programme level dashboards. Monitoring of acute / community / mental health quality matrix. Clinical coding reviews / audits. Budget reporting down to individual GP Practice level. GP Practice level dashboard reports include high flyers. Commissioning (Pseudonymised) – Mental Health, Maternity, IAPT, CYPHS and DIDS Commissioner reporting: Summary by provider view - plan & actuals year to date (YTD). Summary by Patient Outcome Data (POD) view - plan & actuals YTD. Summary by provider view - activity & finance variance by POD. Planned care by provider view - activity & finance plan & actuals YTD. Planned care by POD view - activity plan & actuals YTD. Provider reporting. Statutory returns. Statutory returns - monthly activity return. Statutory returns - quarterly activity return. Delayed discharges. Quality & performance referral to treatment reporting. Readmissions analysis. Production of aggregate reports for CCG Business Intelligence. Production of project / programme level dashboards. Monitoring of mental health quality matrix. Clinical coding reviews / audits. Budget reporting down to individual GP Practice level. GP Practice level dashboard reports include high flyers.

Processing:

Processing activities: Data must only be used as stipulated within this Data Sharing Agreement. Data Processors must only act upon specific instructions from the Data Controller. Data can only be stored at the addresses listed under storage addresses. The Data Controller and any Data Processor will only have access to records of patients specified within the Data Minimisation Efforts within Annex A of the Data Sharing Agreement. Access is limited to those substantive employees with authorised user accounts used for identification and authentication. Patient level data will not be shared outside of the CCG unless it is for the purpose of Direct Care, where it may be shared only with those health professionals who have a legitimate relationship with the patient and a legitimate reason to access the data. CCGs should work with general practices within their CCG to help them fulfil data controller responsibilities regarding flow of identifiable data into risk stratification tools. No record level data will be linked other than as specifically detailed within this application/agreement. Data will only be shared with those parties listed and will only be used for the purposes laid out in the application/agreement. The data to be released from NHS Digital will not be national data, but only that data relating to the specific locality of interest of the applicant. The DSCRO (part of NHS Digital) will apply Type 2 objections before any identifiable data leaves the DSCRO. Risk Stratification Identifiable SUS data is obtained from the SUS Repository to the Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO). Data quality management and standardisation of data is completed by the DSCRO and the data identifiable at the level of NHS number is transferred securely to North of England CSU for landing only. The CSU then pass the data securely to the CCG, who hold the SUS data within the secure Data Centre on N3. Identifiable GP Data is securely sent from the GP system to the CCG. SUS data is linked to GP data in the risk stratification tool by the CCG. As part of the risk stratification processing activity, GPs have access to the risk stratification tool within the data processor, which highlights patients with whom the GP has a legitimate relationship and have been classed as at risk. The only identifier available to GPs is the NHS numbers of their own patients. Any further identification of the patients will be completed by the GP on their own systems. The CCG who hosts the risk stratification system that holds SUS data is limited to those administrative staff with authorised user accounts used for identification and authentication. Once the CCG has completed the processing, access by the GP is available through the online system via a secure N3 connection to access the data pseudonymised at patient level. Commissioning (Pseudonymised) – SUS and Local Flows The Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO) obtains a flow of SUS identifiable data for the CCG from the SUS Repository. The DSCRO also obtains identifiable local provider data for the CCG directly from Providers. Data quality management and pseudonymisation of data is completed by the DSCRO and the pseudonymised data is then passed securely to North of England CSU for the addition of derived fields. North England CSU then pass the pseudonymised data to the CCG. The CCG analyse the data to see patient journeys for pathways or service design, re-design and de-commissioning. Allowed linkage is between SUS data sets and local flows. Patient level data will not be shared outside of the CCG and will only be shared within the CCG on a need to know basis, as per the purposes stipulated within the Data Sharing Agreement. External aggregated reports only with small number suppression can be shared. Commissioning (Pseudonymised) – Mental Health, MSDS, IAPT, CYPHS and DIDS The Data Services for Commissioners Regional Office (DSCRO) obtains a flow of data identifiable at the level of NHS number for Mental Health (MHSDS, MHMDS, MHLDDS), Maternity (MSDS), Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT), Child and Young People’s Health (CYPHS) and Diagnostic Imaging (DIDS) for commissioning purposes. Data quality management and pseudonymisation of data is completed by the DSCRO and the pseudonymised data is then passed securely to North England CSU for the addition of derived fields. North of England CSU then pass the pseudonymised data to the CCG. The CCG analyses the data to see patient journeys for pathway or service design, re-design and de-commissioning. Patient level data will not be shared outside of the CCG and will only be shared within the CCG on a need to know basis, as per the purposes stipulated within the Data Sharing Agreement. External aggregated reports only with disclosure control applied can be shared.

Objectives:

Objective for processing: Risk Stratification To use SUS data identifiable at the level of NHS number according to S.251 CAG 7-04(a)/2013 (and Primary Care Data) for the purpose of Risk Stratification. Risk Stratification provides a forecast of future demand by identifying high risk patients. This enables commissioners to initiate proactive management plans for patients that are potentially high service users. Risk Stratification enables GPs to better target intervention in Primary Care Commissioning (Pseudonymised) – SUS and Local Flows To use pseudonymised data to provide intelligence to support commissioning of health services. The pseudonymised data is required to ensure that analysis of health care provision can be completed to support the needs of the health profile of the population within the CCG area based on the full analysis of multiple pseudonymised datasets. The CCGs commission services from a range of providers covering a wide array of services. Each of the data flow categories requested supports the commissioned activity of one or more providers. Commissioning (Pseudonymised) – Mental Health, Maternity, IAPT, CYPHS and DIDS To use pseudonymised data for the following datasets to provide intelligence to support commissioning of health services : Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS) Mental Health Learning Disability Data Set (MHLDDS) Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS) Maternity Services Data Set (MSDS) Improving Access to Psychological Therapy (IAPT) Child and Young People Health Service (CYPHS) Diagnostic Imaging Data Set (DIDS) The pseudonymised data is required to ensure that analysis of health care provision can be completed to support the needs of the health profile of the population within the CCG area based on the full analysis of multiple pseudonymised datasets. No record level data will be linked other than as specifically detailed within this application/agreement. Data will only be shared with those parties listed and will only be used for the purposes laid out in the application/agreement. The data to be released from NHS Digital will not be national data, but only that data relating to the specific locality of interest of the applicant.


Project 2 — NIC-30487-G4F4J

Opt outs honoured: Y

Sensitive: Sensitive

When: 2016/12 — 2017/08.

Repeats: Ongoing

Legal basis: Section 251 approval is in place for the flow of identifiable data

Categories: Identifiable, Anonymised - ICO code compliant

Datasets:

  • SUS (Accident & Emergency, Inpatient and Outpatient data)
  • Local Provider Data - Acute, Ambulance, Community, Diagnostic Services, Emergency Care, Mental Health, Other not elsewhere classified, Primary Care
  • Local Provider Data - Acute
  • Local Provider Data - Ambulance
  • Local Provider Data - Community
  • Local Provider Data - Diagnostic Services
  • Local Provider Data - Emergency Care
  • Local Provider Data - Mental Health
  • Local Provider Data - Other not elsewhere classified
  • Local Provider Data - Primary Care
  • SUS Accident & Emergency data
  • SUS Admitted Patient Care data
  • SUS Outpatient data

Benefits:

1) Supporting Quality Innovation Productivity and Prevention (QIPP) to review demand management and pathways. 2) Supporting Joint Strategic Needs Assessment (JSNA) for specific disease types. 3) Health economic modelling using: (a) Analysis on provider performance against 18 Weeks wait targets. (b) Learning from and predicting likely patient pathways for certain conditions, in order to influence early interventions and other treatments for patients. (c) Analysis of outcome measures for differential treatments, accounting for the full patient pathway. (d) Analysis to understand emergency care and linking A&E and Emergency Urgent Care Flows (EUCC) flows. 4) Commissioning cycle support for grouping and re-costing previous activity. 5) Enables monitoring of: (a) CCG outcome indicators. (b) Non-financial validation of activity. (c) Successful delivery of integrated care within the CCG. (d) Checking frequent or multiple attendances to improve early intervention and avoid admissions. (e) Case management. (f) Care service planning. (g) Commissioning and performance management. (h) List size verification by GP practices. (i) Understanding the care of patients in nursing homes. 6) Feedback to NHS service providers on data quality at an aggregate and individual record level. Some of the benefits that have already been seen include: • Supporting changes in pathways and processes implemented to achieve the CCG’s QIPP savings • For the monthly reconciliation of activity with James Paget Hospital • In the planning and negotiations for contracts with our main acute providers • To allow more rigorous challenging of activity at James Paget and Norfolk and Norwich hospitals • To support a public consultation called ‘the Shape of the System’ which was looking at how the local system should be like in the future. This included the impact of closing community hospitals on the James Paget Hospital     

Outputs:

1) Commissioner reporting: (a) Summary by provider view - plan & actuals year to date (YTD). (b) Summary by Patient Outcome Data (POD) view - plan & actuals YTD. (c) Summary by provider view - activity & finance variance by POD. (d) Planned care by provider view - activity & finance plan & actuals YTD. (e) Planned care by POD view - activity plan & actuals YTD. (f) Provider reporting. (g) Statutory returns. (h) Statutory returns - monthly activity return. (i) Statutory returns - quarterly activity return. (j) Delayed discharges. (k) Quality & performance referral to treatment reporting. 2) Readmissions analysis. 3) Production of aggregate reports for CCG Business Intelligence. 4) Production of project / programme level dashboards. 5) Monitoring of acute / community / mental health quality matrix. 6) Clinical coding reviews / audits. 7) Budget reporting down to individual practice level.

Processing:

1) North of England Data Services for Commissioning Regional Office (DSCRO) – part of the HSCIC - receive SUS data identifiable at the level of NHS number from the SUS Repository at HSCIC. DSCRO North of England also receive identifiable local provider data directly from Providers (as per Data Services for Commissioners Directions 2015). 2) Data quality management and standardisation of data is completed by the DSCRO. 3) Prior to the release of SUS data by North England DSCRO Type 2 objections will be applied and the relevant patients’ data redacted 4) The DSCRO then securely transfers the SUS data identifiable at the level of NHS number and Local Provider data identifiable at the level of NHS number to North England Commissioning Support Unit (NECS). 5) Data is securely exchanged between North of England CSU and NHS Great Yarmouth and Waveney CCG via encrypted data transfers.. 6) CCG links data across providers to see patient journeys for pathway or service design, re-design and de-commissioning. 7) CCG completes aggregation of required data for CCG management use - Data is disclosed from the CCG and is aggregated to stop identification of individuals. 8) CCG links data for checking regular service attendees to improve early intervention and avoid admissions.

Objectives:

SUS and Local Provider Data - Renewal of existing agreement to continue to use data identifiable at the level of NHS Number to provide intelligence to support commissioning of health services. The NHS Number is required to ensure that analysis of health care provision can be completed to support the needs of the health profile of the population within the CCG area based on analysis of patient data across health pathways.